Baoliang ju hui 寶梁聚會 (T0310[44])
= Taishō vol XI 638c28–639a18
= Taishō vol XI 647a19-26.
= Taishō vol XI 647a12-27.
= Taishō vol XI 647a6-20.
= Taishō vol XI 647a4-9.
= Taishō vol XI 647a4-6.
= Taishō vol XI 646a13-16.
= Taishō vol XI 643c21-28.
= Taishō vol XI 645c11-15. Lüshun Museum collection 旅順
= Taishō vol XI 645a12-16. Lüshun Museum collection 旅順
= Taishō vol XI 643a15-22. Lüshun Museum collection 旅順
= Taishō vol XI 638c20-22. Lüshun Museum collection 旅順
= Taishō vol XI 638c19-23. Lüshun Museum collection 旅順
Text 678 on CD 61
One juan available: Called 貞 32–113
= Taishō vol XI 645a16-29. See Stein 5664. Photo published in Huang and Zhang 2012: 556–557, plate p. 218.
= Taishō vol XI 644b18-c3
= Taishō vol XI 644a28-647b11. Several leaves, however, are missing, of which one can be recovered from Zhejiang 浙江 158.
= Taishō vol XI 641a22-644b1. In Nogami Shunjō 野上俊静, ed. 1965-1972. Ōtani Daigaku shozō Tonkō koshakyō 大谷大学所蔵敦煌古写経 [Ancient copies of Buddhist scriptures discovered in the Tun-huang caves, now preserved in Otani University]. 2 vols. Kyoto: Ōtani Daigaku Tōyōgaku Kenkyūshitsu: II text 12.
= Taishō vol XI 640b23–c9. These three fragments obviously belong to the same manuscript, not only on the basis of their continuous text but also because of the handwriting. BD16189B is much less damaged than BD16189A, and BD16189C has been drastically trimmed. Moreover, based on the handwriting, the number of characters per line (17, admittedly a standard number), and the distribution of text, it is quite possible that these three fragments may have belonged originally to the same manuscript as Ōtani 707
= Taishō vol XI 638c18-639a10
= Taishō vol XI 638c10-644a28